| Opening Address
by Assoc Prof Koo Tsai Kee Senior
Parliamentary Secretary Ministry of National Development At
the Conference-cum-Workshop on "PROFITING FROM EFFICIENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT"
at Grand Hyatt Hotel 7 November 2001, 9.00 AM.
Distinguished Guests,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am pleased
to be here this morning at the opening ceremony of this conference-cum workshop
"Profiting From Efficient Energy Management". Energy
Efficiency and Environmental Protection Singapore
is a small city-state with hardly any natural resources. We are totally dependant
on imported fuels to provide all our energy needs. We have to use this energy
efficiently not only for competitive reasons, but also to conserve natural resources
and minimise the emission of air pollutants and carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas
that causes global warming. We have, therefore, adopted the promotion of energy
efficiency and the use of cleaner sources of energy as our national agenda. We
have also progressed from viewing energy efficiency improvements purely as an
issue relating to costs and competitiveness to one of sustainable development.
Energy
efficiency improvements and environmental protection both involve the efficient
use of resources, which is key to sustainable development. By improving energy
efficiency and using clean energy sources, we not only will minimise emissions
of air pollutants, but also enhance the competitiveness and profitability of businesses
by reducing the direct energy and material costs.
What
is Energy Efficiency? What
is energy efficiency? Energy efficiency means the relationship between the output
or service level of a device or a system and the energy that is put into it. Improving
energy efficiency is, therefore, doing more with equal or less energy input. Energy
efficiency is thus often called a 'no-regrets' policy as organisations reap benefits
following this approach. However,
when discussing energy efficiency improvements, it is important to be clear about
the difference between what is technologically feasible and the real world of
energy suppliers, businesses and consumers. At the national level, we should also
consider the societal effects from energy efficiency improvements. Allow me to
elaborate on these viewpoints. Technological
Approach When
we consider energy efficiency improvements from the technological angle, we are
looking at the achievable savings that result from the maximum energy efficiency
improvement available at a given time, regardless of cost considerations. The
quandary we face is that nearly all devices and systems are less energy efficient
than their theoretical maximal. There is always potential for improvement. Thus,
few things are truly energy efficient. A device or system can only be more or
less energy efficient than the alternatives at a given time and in a given situation.
But
conditions change. Innovation produces improved devices and systems, technology
breakthroughs lead to new energy sources, prices fluctuate and government policies
and programmes change. Today's efficient device is rarely tomorrow's.
Economic
Potential Approach If
we consider the economic potential for energy efficiency improvements, we find
that it depends largely on the discount rate used. The problem here is that different
discount rates are used by different market entities. Instead
of trying to determine the single, most appropriate discount rate to use to optimise
efficiency, a better strategy in policy-making would be to understand how these
differences are played out in the marketplace.
Market
Potential Approach
This
leads to the third approach - that of assessing the savings that can actually
be realised in practice, which is the market potential. It reflects what is seen
to be technically and financially viable by independent individuals and organisations.
The
market potential and cost-effectiveness of an efficiency measure depends on which
costs and benefits are considered. For example, from a business perspective, the
only relevant costs and benefits are those that affect the bottom line. Costs
include the expenditures for equipment, engineering and installation as well as
charges for production downtime. The benefits include energy cost savings, plus
enhanced labour productivity, environmental compliance or product quality. To
individual consumers, on the other hand, product characteristics are often more
important. As energy efficiency is often a minor consideration in their purchasing
choices, its costs would have to be paid back at a rapid rate.
Societal
Potential Approach
Finally,
we should also approach the issue by asking how efficiency savings can be had
with a net positive economic effect to society as a whole - the societal potential.
Here, various economic actors are included and externalities taken into consideration.
An example would be societal investment in energy efficiency to reduce electricity
demand growth when this is less expensive than say building a new power plant.
From
a national viewpoint, there is a wider range of relevant costs and benefits. These
include monetary, health, and environmental costs and benefits that accrue to
society. Certain
societal benefits, such as reduced air pollution are external to the market and
are difficult to quantify. Moreover, they accrue to society at large, not to the
particular unit implementing the efficiency measure. This
wider definition of cost-effectiveness is the more important measure for government
policy aimed at energy use and environmental quality.
The
Grand Hyatt Hotel Experience
On
this note, I would like to congratulate the management of Grand Hyatt Hotel for
its exemplary energy management programme that has translated into real dollar
savings. Hyatt has taken a long-term approach to energy management and invested
in a new state-of-the-art energy efficient air-conditioning system that has not
just reduced its energy costs substantially but also resulted in significant other
benefits. These include the freeing of floor space, improved customer comfort,
plant reliability and maintainability, improved working conditions for its staff
and enhanced skills and productivity. Overall, a highly commendable project.
What is equally significant to me is that Hyatt has also expressed its intention
to share the information it has gathered in this project in a transparent way.
This will, I am sure, inspire other hotel and building owners to undertake similar
projects in energy efficiency. I strongly urge you to review the material and
Hyatt's accomplishment so that you can benefit and profit from the experience.
Concluding
Remarks Energy
efficiency competes with other issues for limited resources within a company.
As more businesses begin to realise the profitability of resource efficiency,
it will grow in importance as a strategy to stay competitive and maximise shareholder
value. I
would like to congratulate the Singapore Association for Environmental, Occupational
Health and Safety Companies and the Energy Market Authority for organising this
conference cum workshop, and the support given by the Ministry of the Environment
and the National Energy Efficiency Committee. I would also like to wish all participants
a fruitful and rewarding conference over the next two days. I hope this conference
will mark the beginning of many energy efficiency projects and initiatives in
the future. Thank you. |